{"id":1178,"date":"2023-11-15T00:32:53","date_gmt":"2023-11-15T00:32:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/?page_id=1178"},"modified":"2024-10-02T01:50:17","modified_gmt":"2024-10-02T01:50:17","slug":"seminars","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/?page_id=1178","title":{"rendered":"BEE Seminars"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Abstract: We consider a dynamic Club Goods Game in which each player can include and\/or exclude other players into their personal club, and potentially make contributions to their club which will benefit all their club members. To understand the reciprocity dynamics behind club membership and contributions, we implement four experimental treatments which vary based on whether club members can be invited, excluded, both or neither. We find that contributions are highest, and club size is most stable, under the most flexible membership determination procedure. The ability to permanently exclude members from one\u2019s club induces the greatest reciprocal behavior among players, which is a key determinant of contributions. In addition, we examine how prior experience in the Club Goods Game affects subsequent contributions in a standard Public Goods Game. Experience in the flexible membership Club Goods Game treatment leads to the highest contributions in the Public Goods game, while fully inflexible membership produces the lowest contributions. Altogether, our study helps pinpoint the group and individual level dynamics for effective provision of non-rival resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio: Jaimie Wei-Hung Lien\uff0c\u5c71\u4e1c\u5927\u5b66\u7ecf\u6d4e\u7814\u7a76\u9662\u6559\u6388\u3001\u535a\u58eb\u751f\u5bfc\u5e08\uff0c\u5c71\u5927\u7279\u8058\u6559\u6388\u3002\u7f8e\u56fd\u536b\u5c14\u65af\u5229\u5973\u5b50\u5b66\u9662\u5b66\u58eb\uff0c\u7f8e\u56fd\u52a0\u5229\u798f\u5c3c\u4e9a\u5927\u5b66\u5723\u5730\u4e9a\u54e5\u5206\u6821\u7855\u58eb\u3001\u535a\u58eb\u3002\u62c5\u4efbNorth American Journal of Economics and Finance\u7b49\u591a\u4efd\u56fd\u9645\u5b66\u672f\u671f\u520a\u5ba2\u5ea7\u7f16\u8f91\u4e0e\u7f16\u59d4\u6210\u5458\uff0c\u62c5\u4efb\u5927\u9646\u3001\u9999\u6e2f\u3001\u53f0\u6e7e\u3001\u65b0\u52a0\u5761\u7b49\u653f\u5e9c\u79d1\u7814\u8d44\u52a9\u673a\u6784\u8bc4\u5ba1\u4e13\u5bb6\uff0c\u62c5\u4efb\u591a\u6240\u9ad8\u6821\u6559\u5e08\u664b\u5347\u5916\u5ba1\u4e13\u5bb6\uff0c\u62c5\u4efb31\u79cd\u671f\u520a\u533f\u540d\u8bc4\u5ba1\u4eba\uff0c\u591a\u6b21\u83b7\u8bc4\u6770\u51fa\u8bc4\u5ba1\u4eba\u3002\u7814\u7a76\u9886\u57df\u5305\u62ec\u884c\u4e3a\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u3001\u5b9e\u9a8c\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u3001\u5e94\u7528\u5fae\u89c2\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\uff0c\u7814\u7a76\u4e3b\u9898\u6d89\u53ca\u5408\u4f5c\u4e92\u60e0\u3001\u53c2\u7167\u4f9d\u8d56\u3001\u73b0\u65f6\u504f\u8bef\u3001\u4ee3\u8868\u6027\u504f\u8bef\u7b49\u91cd\u8981\u884c\u4e3a\u73b0\u8c61\u3002\u5148\u540e\u4e3b\u6301\u8fc7\u56fd\u5bb6\u81ea\u7136\u79d1\u5b66\u57fa\u91d1\u9879\u76ee\u3001\u6559\u80b2\u90e8\u79d1\u7814\u9879\u76ee\u3001\u9999\u6e2f\u7814\u7a76\u8d44\u52a9\u5c40\u9879\u76ee\u3002\u76ee\u524d\u5df2\u6709\u8bba\u6587\u53d1\u8868\u4e8eNature Communications\u3001PNAS\u3001American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings)\u3001Games and Economic Behavior\u7b49\u56fd\u9645\u77e5\u540d\u671f\u520a\u3002\u66fe\u83b7”\u4e2d\u56fd\u4fe1\u606f\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b662016\u9752\u5e74\u521b\u65b0\u5956”\u3001”\u4e2d\u56fd\u4fe1\u606f\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b662018\u9752\u5e74\u521b\u65b0\u5956”\u548c”\u4e2d\u56fd\u4fe1\u606f\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b662011-2015\u7406\u8bba\u8d21\u732e\u5956”\u3002<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Abstract: In designing priority-based matching problems, such as school choice, the quota of each school is, to some extent, a design variable for a market designer. We define an ex-post student-optimal stable matching (ESOSM) as a matching that is stable at some implementable quota distribution, and is not Pareto dominated by any stable matching among all implementable quota distributions. A simple question is whether the total resources subject to several constraints are optimally distributed in the above sense. As optimal quota distributions vary depending on students\u2019 preferences realized, no predetermined quota distribution is optimal for all of the students\u2019 preferences. This requires a new matching mechanism design for the variable quota distributions. We propose the novel mechanism called quota adjustment process (QAP), which endogenously finds an ESOSM and the corresponding optimal quota distribution for any preferences and any initial quota distribution. To put this into practice, we proposed the QAP in the process of admission reform at the University of Tsukuba in Japan. Our proposal was officially approved and implemented at the University of Tsukuba in 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio:\u65e5\u672c\u5e86\u5e94\u4e49\u587e\u5927\u5b66\uff08 Keio University\uff09\u6559\u6388\u3002\u7814\u7a76\u9886\u57df\u4e3a\u5fae\u89c2\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u3001\u535a\u5f08\u8bba\u3001\u5339\u914d\u5e02\u573a\u8bbe\u8ba1\u3001\u5b9e\u9a8c\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u3002\u7814\u7a76\u53d1\u8868\u4e8e\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u9876\u7ea7\u671f\u520aAmerican Economic Review\u3001Journal of Economic Theory\u3001American Economic Journal: Microeconomics<\/em>\u7b49\u3002<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Abstract: The realization that the human brain is dynamic and constantly changing arises from the seminal work of (Hebb, 1949) which posits how synaptic connections between neurons change over time based on their correlated activity with the insightful phrase about neuronal firing \u2013 “fire together, wire together”. This Hebbian ‘learning’, reflecting the brain’s ability to change and adapt based on prior experiences, has led to the predictive brain plasticity hypothesis (Halvagal and Zenke, 2023) pointing to a mechanism which underpins the brain’s proactive tendency to seek causal understanding by anticipating future events and conditions beyond reacting to stimuli as they arise. (A tiger’s roar cannot be confused with the harmless chirp of a bird.) This capacity to anticipate sensory contingencies without being surprised is crucial for survival while minimizing energy expenditure by our miserly brain (Friston, 2010; Clark, 2013; Hohwy, 2013) which seeks accuracy by updating priors along with synaptic weights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In situations involving risk and uncertainty, how available choices are perceived may have pivotal influence on the eventual decision and the corresponding outcomes. Building on predictive brain plasticity along with the neurochemistry of attention and valuation, we propose a neurobiological model of sensory choice perception from sensation (of stimuli) to perception of the options in a choice situation (especially the consequentialist aspects of the specific choices) through attention and memory (necessarily selective) prior to their evaluation in which cognition has a natural role. Given the inherent scarcity of attention, stimuli surviving the initial filtration are allocated attention in proportion to surprise (when error or deviation from the predictive prior surpasses a certain threshold), which is costly. This triggers the formation of a new prior modulated by a tendency to resist change called inertia. The resulting perceived choice is linked to observable decision making through an attention theory model (Chew, 1983; Chew, Wang, Zhong, 2023). We derive testable implications using for instance pharmacological intervention linking predictive brain plasticity to decision making, which delivers context dependent choice and accounts for several choice anomalies in the literature, including loss-gain framing, Allais behavior, ambiguity attitude, and source preference, from a sensory perception perspective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio: Chew Soo Hong is Chief Professor (\u9996\u5e2d\u6559\u6388) at the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, where he directs its China Center for Behavioral Economics and Finance. Chew is among the pioneers of axiomatic non-expected utility models and has been conducting research in the biology of decision-making. He is a fellow of the Econometric Society, which awarded him the Leonard J. Savage thesis prize, and of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory. Chew is an Emeritus Professor (\u7ec8\u8eab\u8363\u4f11\u6559\u6388) at NUS and has previously taught at HKUST, UC Irvine, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Arizona. He has published in well-regarded journals in economics such as Econometrica, JPE, Review of Economic Studies, Journal of Economic Theory, Journal of the European Economic Association, and Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, as well as more biologyoriented ones including Neuron, PNAS, BioMedicine & Neuroscience, and Biobehavioral Reviews, Neuroimage, PLOS ONE, and PRSB.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Abstract:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In many economic situations, a sender communicates strategically with a receiver not only to influence the latter’s decision-making but also to influence how certain unobserved characteristics of herself (e.g. loyalty, integrity, or smartness) are perceived. To study such strategic interactions, we introduce image-building motives into the canonical framework of Bayesian persuasion. We characterize how the sender optimally sacrifices her persuasive influence on the receiver’s decision to boost her reputation, by manipulating the communication protocol about a payoff-relevant state. Whether the receiver fares better or worse compared to the pure persuasion setting may depend on the selected equilibrium, and effects can be non-monotone with respect to the sender’s characteristics. We illustrate our findings within various classic payoff environments, for instance with quadratic losses or state-independent sender preferences. Finally, we use the model to shed new light on a wider range of applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio.:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u5218\u70c1\uff0c\u73b0\u4efb\u5317\u4eac\u5927\u5b66\u5149\u534e\u7ba1\u7406\u5b66\u9662\u5e94\u7528\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u7cfb\u526f\u6559\u6388\u30022019\u5e74\u6bd5\u4e1a\u4e8e\u745e\u58eb\u82cf\u9ece\u4e16\u5927\u5b66\uff0c\u83b7\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u535a\u58eb\u5b66\u4f4d\u3002\u76ee\u524d\u4e3b\u8981\u7814\u7a76\u9886\u57df\u4e3a\u4ea7\u4e1a\u4e0e\u7ec4\u7ec7\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\uff0c\u535a\u5f08\u8bba\uff0c\u4ee5\u53ca\u673a\u5236\u8bbe\u8ba1\u7406\u8bba\u3002\u7814\u7a76\u6210\u679c\u53d1\u8868\u4e8e\u56fd\u5185\u5916\u77e5\u540d\u5b66\u672f\u671f\u520a\uff0c\u5982American Economic Review, Theoretical Economics, Journal of Economic Theory, Economic Journal, RAND Journal of Economics, Games and Economic Behavior\u7b49\u30022022\u5e74\u5165\u9009\u4e2d\u56fd\u4fe1\u606f\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u4f1a\u4e4c\u5bb6\u57f9\u8d44\u52a9\u8ba1\u5212\uff0c2023\u5e74\u83b7\u56fd\u5bb6\u81ea\u7136\u79d1\u5b66\u57fa\u91d1\u59d4\u4f18\u79c0\u9752\u5e74\u79d1\u5b66\u57fa\u91d1\u9879\u76ee\u8d44\u52a9\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Abstract:
Individualism and collectivism are treated as bargaining norms in a new-classical growth model where capital can be more efficiently formed by bilateral cooperation than by autarky. For bilateral cooperation, there is a holdup problem because each side has to place some input before cooperation starts. When the relationship of the pre-cooperation inputs of two sides is substitutional, individualism achieves the best allocation while collectivism does not. When this relationship is complementary, collectivism achieves the best allocation while individualism does not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio.:
\u9999\u6e2f\u79d1\u6280\u5927\u5b66\u526f\u6559\u6388\uff0c \u5728\u52a0\u5165\u9999\u6e2f\u79d1\u5927\u524d\u4e3a\u7f8e\u56fd\u5eb7\u5185\u5c14\u5927\u5b66\u7ecf\u6d4e\u7cfb\u52a9\u7406\u6559\u6388\u3002\u7814\u7a76\u9886\u57df\u4e3a\u5b8f\u89c2\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u3001\u8d27\u5e01\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u3002\u7814\u7a76\u53d1\u8868\u4e8e\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u9876\u7ea7\u671f\u520aEconometrica\u3001Journal of Monetary Economics\u3001Journal of Economic Theory\u3001International Economic Review<\/em>\u7b49\u3002<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Abstract:
We analyze a duopolistic model of quality disclosure in which product differentiation can be either horizontal or vertical under two vertically differentiated product attributes. Disclosure is fully revealing in the absence of disclosure cost. When disclosure is costly, firms partially disclose. We apply the familiar economic properties of absolute and comparative advantages in a novel way to characterize partial disclosure under the multiple product attributes. The type of product differentiation and intensity of competition interact with absolute and comparative attribute advantages in determining the equilibrium non-disclosure sets of the firms. When consumers fall short of forming rational expectation after non-disclosure, firms may partially disclose even without disclosure cost, and the same properties continue to dictate firms\u2019 disclosure behavior in the boundedly rational paradigm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio.:
Professor Lai joined Lehigh University in 2009 after obtaining his doctorate from the University of Pittsburgh. A native of Hong Kong, he obtained his undergraduate and master’s degrees at The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and The University of Hong Kong. His research focuses on using the tools of game theory and laboratory experiments to study strategic communication between parties with conflicting interests. He teaches microeconomics and game theory at the undergraduate and graduate levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

\u6458\u8981\uff1a\u8fd1\u5e74\u6765\uff0c\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u6280\u672f\u7279\u522b\u662f\u4ee5ChatGPT\u4e3a\u4ee3\u8868\u7684\u5927\u8bed\u8a00\u6a21\u578b\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u6280\u672f\u8fc5\u901f\u53d1\u5c55\u3002\u672c\u7814\u7a76\u57fa\u4e8e2018\u5e741\u6708\u81f32023\u5e744\u6708\u95f4\u7684102\u4e07\u6761\u6765\u81ea\u667a\u8054\u62db\u8058\u5e73\u53f0\u7684\u65b0\u589e\u5de5\u4f5c\u804c\u4f4d\u6570\u636e\uff0c\u8fd0\u7528\u6587\u672c\u5206\u6790\u6280\u672f\uff0c\u57fa\u4e8e\u5177\u4f53\u5de5\u4f5c\u5185\u5bb9\u3001\u4efb\u52a1\u548c\u804c\u4e1a\u7b49\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u6784\u5efa\u4e86\u5927\u8bed\u8a00\u6a21\u578b\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u6280\u672f\u66b4\u9732\u6307\u6570\uff0c\u523b\u753b\u4e86\u4e2d\u56fd\u52b3\u52a8\u529b\u5e02\u573a\u5bf9\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u6280\u672f\u7684\u53cd\u5e94\uff0c\u5206\u6790\u4e86\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bf9\u65b0\u6280\u672f\u7684\u9002\u5e94\u6027\u8c03\u6574\uff0c\u5e76\u901a\u8fc7\u56fd\u9645\u6bd4\u8f83\u8bc4\u4f30\u4e86\u4ed6\u4eec\u5728\u5e94\u5bf9\u65b0\u6280\u672f\u4e0a\u7684\u8868\u73b0\u3002\u672c\u6587\u53d1\u73b0\uff1a\u8fc7\u53bb\u4e94\u5e74\uff0c\u4e2d\u56fd\u52b3\u52a8\u529b\u5e02\u573a\u4e0a\u65b0\u589e\u804c\u4f4d\u7684\u5927\u8bed\u8a00\u6a21\u578b\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u6280\u672f\u66b4\u9732\u5ea6\u5448\u73b0\u964d\u4f4e\u8d8b\u52bf\uff0c\u5e76\u57282022\u5e74\u4e4b\u540e\u52a0\u901f\u4e0b\u964d\uff1b\u53d7\u51b2\u51fb\u8f83\u5927\u7684\u4e3b\u8981\u662f\u767d\u9886\u804c\u4e1a\uff0c\u5982\u8d22\u4f1a\u3001\u7ffb\u8bd1\u3001\u94f6\u884c\u4e1a\u52a1\u3001\u9500\u552e\u53ca\u8f6f\u4ef6\u4e92\u8054\u7f51\u4ece\u4e1a\u8005\u7b49\uff1b\u5c3d\u7ba12021\u5e74\u4f01\u4e1a\u5bf9\u5927\u8bed\u8a00\u6a21\u578b\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u6280\u672f\u7684\u9700\u6c42\u4e0a\u5347\uff0c\u4f46\u8fd1\u4e24\u5e74\u51fa\u73b0\u4e0b\u6ed1\u8d8b\u52bf\uff0c\u663e\u793a\u51fa\u5bf9\u65b0\u6280\u672f\u53d1\u5c55\u7684\u6ede\u540e\u53cd\u5e94\u3002\u4e0e\u5176\u4ed6\u56fd\u5bb6\u76f8\u6bd4\uff0c\u4e2d\u56fd\u52b3\u52a8\u529b\u5e02\u573a\u5bf9\u65b0\u6280\u672f\u7684\u9002\u5e94\u6027\u4ecd\u6709\u5f85\u52a0\u5f3a\u3002\u672c\u6587\u5efa\u8bae\u52a0\u5927\u5bf9\u5927\u8bed\u8a00\u6a21\u578b\u4eba\u5de5\u667a\u80fd\u6280\u672f\u7684\u7814\u53d1\u6295\u5165\uff0c\u964d\u4f4e\u5e94\u7528\u95e8\u69db\uff0c\u9f13\u52b1\u4f01\u4e1a\u548c\u52b3\u52a8\u8005\u66f4\u52a0\u4e3b\u52a8\u5730\u4f7f\u7528\u65b0\u6280\u672f\u3002<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio: \u5f20\u4e39\u4e39\uff0c\u5317\u4eac\u5927\u5b66\u56fd\u5bb6\u53d1\u5c55\u7814\u7a76\u9662\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\uff08\u957f\u8058\uff09\u526f\u6559\u6388\u3001\u6b63\u7814\u7a76\u5458\u3001\u535a\u58eb\u751f\u5bfc\u5e08\u3001\u5317\u5927\u535a\u96c5\u9752\u5e74\u5b66\u8005\u3001\u6559\u80b2\u90e8\u957f\u6c5f\u9752\u5e74\u5b66\u8005\u3002\u73b0\u4efb\u5317\u4eac\u5927\u5b66\u56fd\u5bb6\u53d1\u5c55\u7814\u7a76\u9662\u52a9\u7406\u9662\u957f\uff0c\u4e3b\u7ba1\u79d1\u7814\u5de5\u4f5c\u3002\u5f20\u4e39\u4e39\u6bd5\u4e1a\u4e8e\u6fb3\u5927\u5229\u4e9a\u56fd\u7acb\u5927\u5b66\uff0c\u83b7\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u535a\u58eb\u5b66\u4f4d\uff0c\u7814\u7a76\u9886\u57df\u4e3a\u52b3\u52a8\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u3001\u5e94\u7528\u8ba1\u91cf\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u548c\u5b9e\u9a8c\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\uff0c\u7279\u522b\u5173\u6ce8\u8f6c\u578b\u671f\u5f31\u52bf\u7fa4\u4f53\u7684\u798f\u5229\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u4ee5\u53ca\u793e\u4f1a\u53d8\u9769\u3001\u5236\u5ea6\u6587\u5316\u51b2\u51fb\u5bf9\u4eba\u884c\u4e3a\u7684\u5f71\u54cd\u3002\u5176\u5b66\u672f\u6210\u679c\u53d1\u8868\u5728Economic Journal\uff0cNature:Human Behaviour\uff0cJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization\uff0cReview of Income and wealth\uff0c\u300a\u7ecf\u6d4e\u7814\u7a76\u300b\uff0c\u300a\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\uff08\u5b63\u520a\uff09\u300b\u7b49\u56fd\u5185\u5916\u7ecf\u6d4e\u5b66\u6216\u4e00\u822c\u79d1\u5b66\u7c7b\u9876\u7ea7\u671f\u520a\u3002\u8fd1\u51e0\u5e74\uff0c\u5979\u4e3b\u6301\u591a\u9879\u56fd\u5bb6\u81ea\u7136\u79d1\u5b66\u57fa\u91d1\u9762\u4e0a\u9879\u76ee\u3001\u56fd\u5bb6\u793e\u4f1a\u79d1\u5b66\u57fa\u91d1\u91cd\u70b9\u9879\u76ee\u548c\u56fd\u5bb6\u9ad8\u7aef\u667a\u5e93\u91cd\u70b9\u7814\u7a76\u8bfe\u9898\uff1b\u66fe\u591a\u6b21\u4f5c\u4e3a\u4e13\u5bb6\u7ec4\u6210\u5458\u53c2\u4e0e\u4eba\u529b\u8d44\u6e90\u4e0e\u793e\u4f1a\u4fdd\u969c\u90e8\u3001\u56fd\u5bb6\u7edf\u8ba1\u5c40\u548c\u56fd\u5bb6\u75be\u63a7\u4e2d\u5fc3\u7ec4\u7ec7\u7684\u4e13\u9898\u5ea7\u8c08\u548c\u8ba8\u8bba\uff0c\u5bf9\u75ab\u60c5\u9632\u63a7\u653f\u7b56\u548c\u5c31\u4e1a\u95ee\u9898\u63d0\u4f9b\u4e86\u653f\u7b56\u5efa\u8bae\uff1b\u5176\u7814\u7a76\u6210\u679c\u5f62\u6210\u7684\u8d44\u653f\u62a5\u544a\u88ab\u4e2d\u5171\u4e2d\u592e\u529e\u516c\u5385\u3001\u56fd\u52a1\u9662\u548c\u76f8\u5173\u90e8\u59d4\u91c7\u7eb3\u3002
 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Abstract: We consider a dynamic Club Goods Game in which each player can include and\/or exclude other players into their personal club, and potentially make contributions to their club which will benefit all their club members. To understand the reciprocity dynamics behind club membership and contributions, we implement four experimental treatments which vary based on …<\/p>\n

BEE Seminars<\/span> Read More »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"","site-content-layout":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"disabled","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1178","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1178"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1656,"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1178\/revisions\/1656"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/likklab.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}